Head-to-Head Analysis

Camden vs Chicago

Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.

📊 Lifestyle Match

Visualizing the tradeoffs between Camden and Chicago

📋 The Details

Line-by-line data comparison.

Category / Metric Camden Chicago
Financial Overview
Median Income $35,129 $74,474
Unemployment Rate 5.4% 4.2%
Housing Market
Median Home Price $150,000 $365,000
Price per SqFt $109 $261
Monthly Rent (1BR) $1,451 $1,507
Housing Cost Index 117.8 110.7
Cost of Living
Groceries Index 100.3 103.3
Gas Price (Gallon) $3.40 $3.40
Safety & Lifestyle
Violent Crime (per 100k) 195.4 819.0
Bachelor's Degree+ 12.4% 45.7%
Air Quality (AQI) 40 38

Expert Verdict

AI-generated analysis based on current data.

Chicago vs. Camden: The Ultimate Head-to-Head Showdown

Let’s cut to the chase. You’re trying to decide between Chicago and Camden. This isn’t just a choice between two cities; it’s a choice between two completely different planets. One is a global economic engine with deep-dish pizza and brutal winters. The other is a historic, gritty river town that’s often overshadowed by its glitzy neighbor across the Delaware River.

As your Relocation Expert, I’m here to give you the unvarnished truth. We’re going to crunch the numbers, weigh the vibes, and help you figure out where your life actually fits. Grab your coffee—let’s dive in.

The Vibe Check: Fast-Paced Metro vs. Gritty Historic Town

Chicago is a world-class metropolis. It’s the third-largest city in the U.S., a powerhouse of finance, logistics, and culture. The vibe here is electric but intense. You’re trading deep history (think Al Capone, architecture, the Blues) for a high-energy, fast-paced lifestyle. It’s for the hustler, the culture seeker, and the urbanite who wants every major league sport, Michelin-starred restaurant, and world-class museum at their fingertips. But be warned: the "City of Big Shoulders" demands a lot from you. It’s a grind.

Camden, on the other hand, is a city of resilience. Sitting directly across the river from Philadelphia, it’s a working-class port town with a rich industrial past. The vibe is raw, authentic, and undeniably gritty. It’s not about flashy nightclubs; it’s about community, history (the first U.S. battleship was built here), and a slower, more grounded pace. It’s for the artist on a budget, the civil servant, or the commuter who wants Philly’s amenities without the Philly price tag. But let’s be real: Camden has faced significant economic and social challenges, and its image is still very much in transition.

Who is this for?

  • Chicago is for the ambitious professional, the culture vulture, and the family that wants world-class schools and parks (yes, outside of the downtown core).
  • Camden is for the budget-conscious creative, the public sector worker, or the commuter who values proximity to Philadelphia over standalone city amenities.

The Dollar Power: Where Does Your Salary Go Further?

This is where the rubber meets the road. Let’s look at the raw numbers.

Category Chicago Camden The Takeaway
Median Home Price $365,000 $150,000 Camden is 59% cheaper to buy a home.
Rent (1BR) $1,507 $1,451 Surprisingly close. Camden edges out Chicago by a hair, but the gap isn't huge.
Housing Index 110.7 117.8 Wait, what? This measures cost relative to the national average (100). Both are above average, but Camden's index is higher than Chicago's. This suggests that while the absolute price is lower, Camden's housing is expensive relative to local incomes.
Median Income $74,474 $35,129 This is the staggering difference. Chicagoans earn over double what Camden residents do.

Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:
Let’s imagine you earn the U.S. median salary of $74,000.

  • In Chicago: Your income aligns with the local median. You can afford a decent $1,507 apartment. You’re comfortably in the middle class. Your purchasing power is standard for a major metro—good, but not spectacular. The high state income tax (4.95%) takes a bite, and sales tax is steep at 10.25%. Your biggest expense is housing, but your salary is built to handle it.
  • In Camden: Earning $74,000 makes you a high-roller. You’d be earning over double the local median. That $1,451 rent would feel like a steal, leaving you with massive disposable income. The $150,000 median home price would be incredibly attainable. However, New Jersey has a notoriously high property tax burden (often 2-3% of home value) and a progressive income tax that can reach 10.75% for top earners.

Verdict on Cash: If you’re bringing a high salary (say, remote work from a coastal tech firm), Camden offers insane bang for your buck. If you’re earning a local Chicago salary, your money goes further relative to the quality of life and amenities you get, but you’ll feel the pinch more than in Camden.

The Housing Market: Buy vs. Rent & Market Dynamics

Chicago Housing Market:

  • Buy vs. Rent: With a median home price of $365,000, buying is a serious commitment. The market is competitive but segmented. North Side neighborhoods like Lincoln Park command premium prices, while South and West Side areas offer more affordability but come with different challenges. It’s a seller’s market in desirable areas, with homes selling fast.
  • Availability: High inventory compared to Camden, but fierce competition for quality stock in good school districts.

Camden Housing Market:

  • Buy vs. Rent: The $150,000 median home price is a dream for first-time buyers. However, the market is volatile. Much of the housing stock is older and may require work. The high housing index relative to income signals that for locals, it’s still a stretch.
  • Availability: Inventory exists, but the market is less liquid. It can be a buyer’s market for those with cash, but financing can be tricky for certain properties.

Insight: Chicago offers more diverse, stable housing stock. Camden offers lower entry points but carries more risk and potential renovation costs. The high property taxes in Camden can be a hidden dealbreaker that erodes the low purchase price advantage over time.

The Dealbreakers: Quality of Life Reality Check

Traffic & Commute

  • Chicago: A nightmare. The "L" is a lifesaver, but driving is brutal. Average commute times are long, and parking downtown is notoriously expensive and difficult.
  • Camden: You’re at the mercy of the Ben Franklin Bridge or PATCO speedline into Philly. If you work in Philadelphia, the commute is manageable. If you work locally, traffic is lighter. But if you need to get anywhere else, you’re in a car-dependent sprawl.

Weather

  • Chicago: Brutal. 21.0°F average winter temp is just the start. The wind off Lake Michigan is no joke, leading to dangerous wind chills. Summers are humid and hot. You need a serious winter wardrobe and a high tolerance for cold.
  • Camden: Milder. A 55.0°F average is much more forgiving. You get four distinct seasons without the extreme polar vortex. Winters are damp and chilly, summers are humid, but it’s far less severe than Chicago.

Crime & Safety (The Hard Truth)

  • Violent Crime Rate (per 100k):
    • Chicago: 819.0
    • Camden: 195.4

This is where the narrative flips. While Chicago is often vilified in the media, its violent crime rate is significantly higher than Camden's. However, it’s crucial to understand context. Chicago is a massive city of 2.6 million people. Crime is highly concentrated in specific neighborhoods. Areas like Lincoln Park, Lakeview, and the North Shore are very safe. Camden, with its smaller population, has made headlines for crime in the past, but the data shows a dramatic improvement, with rates now lower than many other cities. Still, property crime remains a concern in both cities.

Safety Verdict: No city is perfectly safe. Chicago has more severe crime overall, but it’s unevenly distributed. Camden’s rate is lower, but the city’s economic struggles can lead to different types of instability. Research specific neighborhoods meticulously in either city.

The Verdict: Who Wins Your Relocation?

After weighing the data, the lifestyle, and the cold, hard cash, here’s my expert verdict.

Winner for Families: Chicago
The suburban rings around Chicago offer some of the best public schools in the nation. The city itself has incredible parks, museums, and family-oriented neighborhoods. While more expensive, the quality of public infrastructure (libraries, parks, schools) in the right areas is unmatched. The $365k home price gets you a family home in a solid district. Camden’s public school system, while improving, still faces challenges, and the high property taxes for a lower median income can strain a family budget.

Winner for Singles/Young Professionals: Chicago (by a hair)
If you’re under 30 and want an urban adventure, Chicago’s nightlife, dating scene, and career opportunities are on another level. You can find a $1,500 apartment in a vibrant neighborhood. However, if you’re a young professional with a remote salary from a high-cost city, Camden’s $150k home and low rent become an irresistible path to early homeownership and financial freedom. For pure urban grind and opportunity, Chicago wins. For financial savvy and a quieter life, Camden is a dark horse.

Winner for Retirees: Camden
This is a clear win for Camden. The milder weather is a huge factor—you won’t be battling 20°F winters. The lower cost of living, especially housing, means a fixed income goes much further. Proximity to Philadelphia provides access to top-tier healthcare without the noise and chaos of a major city. Chicago’s brutal winters and higher taxes can be a serious burden on a retirement budget.


Final Pros & Cons Breakdown

CHICAGO

  • Pros: World-class food & culture, robust public transit, diverse neighborhoods, top-tier higher education, major league sports, strong job market (for certain sectors).
  • Cons: Brutal winters, high cost of living, brutal traffic, high taxes (sales, income, property), concentrated crime, intense "rat race" atmosphere.

CAMDEN

  • Pros: Extremely low housing costs, mild weather, proximity to Philadelphia amenities, slower pace of life, lower violent crime rate (per data), strong sense of community.
  • Cons: Limited local job market, economic struggles, high property taxes relative to income, car-dependent, fewer cultural amenities, housing stock often requires renovation.

The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you crave the energy, opportunity, and amenities of a global city and can handle the cost and climate. Choose Camden if your priority is financial flexibility, a milder climate, and you’re willing to trade city glamour for grit and affordability—especially if you have a solid income stream.

Planning a Move?

Use our AI-powered calculator to estimate your expenses from Camden to Chicago.

Calculate Cost