University of Minnesota-Rochester vs University of New Hampshire at Manchester

University of Minnesota-Rochester and University of New Hampshire at Manchester are both well-regarded institutions, but they differ in important ways. Here's how they compare across key dimensions.

Admissions: University of Minnesota-Rochester is more selective with a 71.8% acceptance rate compared to University of New Hampshire at Manchester's 87.3%. Average SAT scores are 1220 and 1140 respectively.

Cost: University of Minnesota-Rochester offers a lower average net price at $12,785, which is $517 less than University of New Hampshire at Manchester ($13,302). After financial aid, this can make a significant difference over 4 years.

Career Outcomes: Graduates from University of Minnesota-Rochester earn a median salary of $69,020 ten years after enrollment, which is $2,541 more than University of New Hampshire at Manchester graduates ($66,479).

Graduation: University of New Hampshire at Manchester leads with a 64.1% graduation rate, and freshman retention rates are 72.1% vs 68.2%.

Campus Size: University of Minnesota-Rochester is the larger campus with 568 total students, while University of New Hampshire at Manchester has 486.

Bottom Line: University of Minnesota-Rochester stands out as both more affordable and producing higher-earning graduates — making it the stronger value proposition overall.